Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chris Crass (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. MBisanz ^talk 02:02, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Chris Crass

Delete, Clearly non-notable. I know him, and agree he is a minor figure in San Francisco activist subculture, but that's not (nearly) enough. Resumes don't belong on Wikipedia —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.107.135.247 (talk) 19:32, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep there are lots of articles on google about him and his works. rkmlai (talk) 18:19, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been listed as an Anarchism task force deletion discussion. Skomorokh 14:56, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:01, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - the external links can be turned into in-line cites, as tagged. Bearian (talk) 23:44, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, seems to fail WP:BIO. The sources are not in the nature of reliable sources. Stifle (talk) 10:35, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep sufficent coverage to justify inclusion. Icewedge (talk) 04:26, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, seems to fail WP:BIO. Entry reads more like a resume than anything else. This is Wikipedia, not LinkedIn. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.148.13.81 (talk) 20:35, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep and tag for further sourcing as any concerns inre article style can be addressed by WP:CLEANUP. Deletion diminishes wiki. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 21:46, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, non-notable: if this person is kept, it would seem to indicate that anyone who has ever helped organize a counter-cultural event and written a few articles in an underground magazine should have a Wikipedia page, and I don't think that is desirable. This person does not stand out in any way that I can see.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.